Building on What We Have: How India’s Atomic Energy Establishment Can Launch a Private Fusion Industry

In his previous blog, Prof. Ranjan argued that America’s new fusion roadmap marks a change of posture — the state stepping back from building the first power plant and instead building the shared infrastructure that lets private companies build it. Here he asks the natural follow-up for India: not what our public institutions should build, but what they should open. A surprising share of what a private fusion industry needs already sits inside the Department of Atomic Energy.

Building on What We Have — Prof. Prabhat Ranjan

A companion essay. This piece continues an argument begun in “Build, Innovate, Grow: What America’s New Fusion Roadmap Means for India.”

In my last essay I argued that the deepest lesson of America’s new fusion roadmap is a change of posture — the state stepping back from building the first power plant, and instead building the shared infrastructure that lets private companies build it. That argument invites an obvious question for India: if our public institutions are to enable a private fusion industry, what exactly should they build?

After some months of looking closely, I think the more urgent question is what they should open. A great deal of what India needs already exists, scattered across the units of the Department of Atomic Energy. The fastest and cheapest way to accelerate fusion here is not a greenfield campaign of new institutes; it is to upgrade, repurpose, and — above all — open a defined slice of the capability the DAE has spent six decades building.

I do not write this from the outside. I carried out my own doctoral fusion research at Berkeley; spent nine years as a scientist at the Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, where I worked on India’s first tokamak, commissioned in 1987; and later led the ADITYA tokamak at the Institute for Plasma Research, along with the operation and control group of its SST-1 superconducting tokamak. Several of the units I describe below I have worked inside, and I have watched this establishment’s plasma capability grow from a single small tokamak into a national programme. What follows is, in part, an argument that India underestimates what it already owns.

A platform, not a building

The American roadmap calls its shared infrastructure the Tritium-Blanket Development Platform — a distributed network of test stands and loops, public and private, that any developer can draw on because no single company can justify building them alone. India can assemble an equivalent almost entirely from assets it already holds. The right unit of thinking is not a new national laboratory but a platform — a coordinated set of shared user facilities, each anchored in an existing DAE unit and opened, under clear rules, to vetted private developers. Let me walk through fusion’s hardest gaps and where, in the DAE, each could be addressed.

Continue reading “Building on What We Have: How India’s Atomic Energy Establishment Can Launch a Private Fusion Industry”

Viksit Bharat Needs Firm Power: Why Fusion Must Be in India’s Energy Plan Now

India’s electricity demand will nearly quadruple by 2047. Solar and wind cannot carry that load alone. The time to build the next generation of baseload is not 2040 — it is today and why fusion must be a strong part of it.

India’s electricity demand will nearly quadruple by 2047. Solar and wind cannot carry that load alone. The time to build the next generation of baseload is not 2040 — it is today.


Disclosure: The author is co-founder of ASPL Fusion, a private Indian fusion company. This article presents an industry perspective on national energy policy. The policy arguments are grounded in publicly available data; the ASPL programme description in Section 5 is provided as a concrete illustration of what a domestic fusion development path can look like in practice.

At a Glance — For Decision-Makers

708 GW peak demand and 2,100 GW total capacity needed by 2047 — the equivalent of building a new US power grid from scratch.

Intermittent renewables alone cannot provide firm power — grid stability requires large-scale dispatchable baseload even with abundant storage.

Fusion now has serious private capital behind it: Microsoft, Google, and OpenAI are structuring power purchase agreements with fusion companies. India risks being a technology importer.

Three budget-cycle asks for 2026: fusion in National Energy Plan · dedicated component development fund · AERB regulatory engagement mandate.

Key Number

India’s Central Electricity Authority projects peak power demand reaching 708 GW by 2047 — four times today’s installed capacity. Meeting it requires 2,100 GW of generation: close to the entire current installed capacity of the US and EU combined. That is the scale of infrastructure build India must manage across the next two decades.

Continue reading “Viksit Bharat Needs Firm Power: Why Fusion Must Be in India’s Energy Plan Now”